Oppressive Universities for lack or assertion!

Mark I appreciated the direction of this class when we took the route to discuss the evolution of management. I discussed this at home as well as in class.When I raised the point of FEMA, and how it use to manage the 3 main necessities of human emergencies and it's devolution (As observed in the aftermath of Hurricane's Katrina & Rita) My girlfriend agreed, but was adamant that her (Being a teacher) is an evolving form of management. This startled me because of al of the bureaucracies she comes home complaining about daily. So I confronted on her, I said "I understand that you wish to be perceived as optimistic, but in reality you can't even make photo-copies without one administrator who is required to be present to do so." I know all teachers, and all employees WISH to be optimistic on the evolution of their management, but there's no perfectly evolving field when there are bureaucratic conflicts in every field. My specific complaint is that University of Phoenix is bureaucratic for corrupt reasons. U O P resists all formats from being uploaded except Microsoft Word. The 2 U O P's Information Systems classes I've taken the Professor as well as the curriculum ignored, and somewhat rejected my call to promote Google Wave as the "Efficient, Real, Effortless" evolution that emailing, social networking, blogging, etc all are going to fuse together seamlessly as well as evolve. The reasons I think U O P isn't taking a productive and un-bureaucratic position is because it's valuing its profits from it's contract with Microsoft more than the education preparation for its own students. I also think the reason the curriculum avoids and ignores Google Wave is because it will expose how inferior the UOP operational format is. Lets face it, if there was a perfect field everyone would be in it. But we have to make compromises, and when we ask ourselves; "What are we NOT Compromising on?" we'll see what's actually evolving, because the adaptation has been so seamless.